model complexity
A Rigorous, Tractable Measure of Model Complexity
Allerbo, Oskar, Schön, Thomas B.
One of the most fundamental properties of a machine learning model is its complexity, with applications across topics such as interpretation, generalization, and model selection. Despite its importance, there is no canonical, model-agnostic way to assess a model's complexity. While simple heuristics, such as the number or magnitude of parameters, yield very crude estimates, hyperparameter-based approaches, such as polynomial degree or kernel length scale, do not generalize across model classes. More rigorous methods, including the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension (VCD) (Vapnik, 2013), Rademacher complexity (RMC) (Bartlett and Mendelson, 2002), and effective number of parameters (or effective degrees of freedom, ENP) (Efron, 1986), are difficult, or even impossible, to compute in practice, leaving the user to resort to crude bounds and/or approximations. The topic is further complicated by the often overlooked distinction between model and function complexity, where the former sets a ceiling on the latter.
Neural approximation of Wasserstein distance via a universal architecture for symmetric and factorwise group invariant functions
Learning distance functions between complex objects, such as the Wasserstein distance to compare point sets, is a common goal in machine learning applications. However, functions on such complex objects (e.g., point sets and graphs) are often required to be invariant to a wide variety of group actions e.g.
Transfer Learning via Minimizing the Performance Gap Between Domains
Boyu Wang, Jorge Mendez, Mingbo Cai, Eric Eaton
To address this issue, we present the first analysis for instance weighting transfer learning that considers the presence of labeled target examples. The contribution of our work is two-fold.1. We address the question ofhow to measure the divergence between two domains given label informationforthetargetdomain.